Bison Range decision prompts speculation

Print Article

  • U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke announced last week that he will no longer pursue the possibility of transferring the National Bison Range to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes. (Jeremy Weber/Lake County Leader)

  • 1

  • U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke announced last week that he will no longer pursue the possibility of transferring the National Bison Range to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes. (Jeremy Weber/Lake County Leader)

  • 1

U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke’s statement last week announcing his decision to halt discussion surrounding the return of the National Bison Range to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes has sparked some head scratching among parties on both sides of the issue.

“I’m as curious as anybody else as to why this got to the top of (Zinke’s) to do list,” said Tom France, senior director of Western Wildlife Conservation for the National Wildlife Federation, which supported the proposed transfer.

Days before President Donald Trump took office in January, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the outgoing administration had initiated an environmental review to explore the possibility of the transfer. The Bison Range is part of the National Wildlife Refuge System administered by the federal agency.

In his emailed announcement, Secretary Zinke stated that he was changing course, citing a commitment never to sell or transfer public land. The range was established as a refuge for the few remaining American Bison in 1908 by President Theodore Roosevelt, who Zinke has repeatedly mentioned as an icon when it comes to conservation policy.

Despite its adherence to talking points, France said Secretary Zinke’s statement leaves many elements of future range management up for interpretation.

“It isn’t clear exactly what statement he’s making, how it relates to the ongoing planning process,” France said.

Part of this ambiguity could stem from portions of Secretary Zinke’s statement stressing a desire to continue involving the tribes in range management and operations.

“The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes will play a pivotal role in our discussions about the best path forward,” Zinke wrote.

While praising Zinke’s decision for keeping the range inside the National Wildlife Refuge System, an official with a group called Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which had sued the Fish and Wildlife Service over the transfer proposal, noted that it remains unclear what form continued tribal involvement could take.

Paula Dinerstein, senior counsel at PEER’s Washington D.C. office, said that past attempts to involve the tribes through annual funding agreements have run into legal obstacles.

She said an agreement in 2010 was shot down after it was determined to hand over certain activities referred to as “inherently federal functions” to the tribes.

PEER’s lawsuit centered around the requirement for the Fish and Wildlife Service to complete a 15-year Comprehensive Conservation Plan, which Dinerstein said had been put on the back burner due to transfer discussions.

Even with Secretary Zinke’s decision, she said she’s under the impression that the part of the plan will still involve exploring an annual funding agreement.

“To us that’s something of a mystery,” she said.

Dinerstein said PEER is not opposed to tribal involvement with the range and could support a funding agreement under the right circumstances, however, any arrangement must be built on solid legal ground.

France said he also understands the range is on schedule to complete a comprehensive plan, which might breathe new life into some of the very issues Zinke’s decision appears to lay to rest.

“That will be the vehicle to discuss how this will be managed,” France said. “A lot more will be heard on this.”

The Fish and Wildlife Service’s discussions with the tribes exploring the possible ownership change of the 18,000-acre wildlife refuge became public in January 2016. The tribes have long sought the return of the land to the Flathead Indian Reservation, after Congress, in 1908,s unilaterally removed it to create a preserve for American Bison — a species then teetering on the brink of extinction.

In an emailed statement after the announcement, CSKT Chairman Vernon Finley thanked Zinke for personally calling to announce his decision, and urged him to continue working with the tribes on management policy on the Bison Range.

“Restoration of the National Bison Range to federal trust ownership for the tribes will always be a logical solution to future management,” the statement read.

Print Article

Read More

Polson City Commissioners holding town hall meetings

April 28, 2017 at 10:14 am | Lake County Leader In an effort to reach out to their constituents, the Polson City Commissioners will be holding town hall meeting during the month of May. The meetings will take place at 7 p.m. at the commission cham...

Comments

Read More

Comedy group promotes cultural awareness in St. Ignatius

April 27, 2017 at 9:56 am | Lake County Leader When it comes to breaking down stereotypes, humor can provide one of the most effective tools. That was the case last week in St. Ignatius during Mission High School’s Cultural Awareness Day, which...

Comments

Read More

Aurora lights up skies over Montana in April

April 27, 2017 at 9:58 am | Lake County Leader It is one of nature’s most breathtaking displays and it has been visible from Polson several times already this year, but scientists with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA...

Comments

Read More

Local school districts eying levy increase, facility upgrades

April 27, 2017 at 9:59 am | Lake County Leader In anticipation of Gov. Steve Bullock signing a new school facility funding bill into law, local school districts have positioned themselves to raise money for some long-awaited upgrades. Senate Bi...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(406) 883-4343
PO BOX 1090
Polson, MT 59860

©2017 Lake County Leader Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X